Weapons of mass destruction are bad essay

It is an appropriate term once one recalls what truly was at stake then. Russians did win that war and, indeed, coerced Georgia into a much more peaceful mood.

Weapons of mass destruction are bad essay

Not what you're looking for?

War The first chemical weapon, the second a biological, the third is classified as a radioactive weapon; and each of these weapons are capable of killing hundreds of thousands. First, the chemical weapon of mass destruction.

The chemical weapon has been around since the start of World War I. During World War I the U. Now, small scale chemical weapons are used on a daily basis. We use tear gas for crowd control, laughing gas to knock someone out, and many different types of anesthesia and crowd control devices that are considered small scale chemical-weapons of mass destruction WMD.

The second type of weapon is a biological weapon.

It’s Hard to Keep Caring - American Police Beat Magazine

A biological weapon make use of many biological agents, including bacteria, viruses, and toxins. These different materials can now be concentrated and used to wipe out whole nations.

In Israel and Africa biological weapons are used on a daily bases. People will take a dead or diseased animal and use it to foul up a well so that when people drink out of that well, they get sick, and Weapons of mass destruction are bad essay spreads throughout villages killing he all the villagers before it can be stopped.

It took them six years to finally develop the missile, but when they were finished they had enough small pox disease to wipe out the entire world twice over.

Weapons of mass destruction are bad essay

The third classification of weapon is a radioactive weapon. Radioactive weapons were created in when a scientist was studying a chemical weapon. The scientist said that the chemical weapon gave off a deadly material that would destroy objects and render land useless unless the land is torn out and replaced with new soil.

The scientist died before he could discover anymore. He died of radiation poisoning. Most weapons can easily be detected, but the hardest one to detect is a biological weapon of mass destruction.

Biological weapons are difficult to identify because they use microscopic bacteria. Lasers and ionization can now be used to automatically find the bacteria in a given sample.

Analysis of the bacteria present can alert the inspector to the presence of common bioterrorism agents like anthrax. Handheld devices are carried by United Nations weapons inspectors.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

This brick-sized machine can analyze a sample and tell whether is contains deadly bacteria or not. This process used to take a whole lab of equipment. As you can see, the U.

We have x-rays, gamma imaging, drones, and powerful lasers that can detect the presence of a nuclear weapon that could kill millions.

All in all the U. Although it is true that many other countries have successfully created weapons of mass destruction that could destroy the U. However, other countries alone having weapons of mass destruction would not be enough to harm us because we are prepared.

In conclusion, even though there are other countries with weapons that could destroy the U. Though many people believe that the U.

Weapons of mass destruction are bad essay

The military only accept the ones that are able to pass the test with one hundred percent accuracy. The men and women are ready any time and any day to react to the threat of a weapon of mass destruction.

All over the United States there are Air Force units patrolling the sky and watching for anything out of the ordinary such as weapons of mass destruction. The pilots that are accepted into the U. Civil Air Patrol go through vigorous training to make them aware and ready to be thrown into action and have to adjust to a situation and solve a problem.

They go through many challenging tests and advanced training to make sure that they can protect the American people. With all of the busy men and women in this country we need something that will never tire or fail to work.Essay: Weapons of Mass Destruction 1.

Analyze the history of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), biological weapons, chemical weapons, and nuclear weapons and the future threat of WMD. Weapon of mass destruction (WMD), weapon with the capacity to inflict death and destruction on such a massive scale and so indiscriminately that its very presence in the hands of a hostile power can be considered a grievous leslutinsduphoenix.com weapons of mass destruction are either nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons—frequently referred to collectively as NBC weapons.

Essay No.

Free English School Essays

Pollution. The word pollution has been derived from the Latin word pollution, which means to make dirty. Pollution is the process of making the environment land water and air dirty by adding harmful substances to it. - Chemical Weapons - Weapons of Mass Destruction Chemical weapons and their use is one of the most important issues facing the world today.

Not only is the use of such weapons highly controversial, but also the very idea of such weapons of mass destruction being in the hands of dangerous leaders. Cathy O'Neil is a data scientist and author of the blog leslutinsduphoenix.com She earned a Ph.D.

in mathematics from Harvard and taught at Barnard College before moving to the private sector, where she worked for the hedge fund D. E. Shaw. Poem of the Masses. my smile melts with confusion artisticly enhanced she titty-danced her clients glanced at her mammarily-expansed bust, de-pantsed.

Meditations On Moloch | Slate Star Codex